Hybrid Threats and Cognitive Warfare: The Strategic Vulnerability of the Peruvian State

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.56221/r81epg89

Keywords:

hybrid threats, cognitive warfare, national security, strategic vulnerability, strategic anticipation, cognitive resilience, strategic leadership

Abstract

This article analyzes the implications of hybrid threats and cognitive warfare for Peru's National Security, with the aim of identifying the main strategic vulnerabilities affecting the stability, governance, and state leadership capacity. The research employed a qualitative, analytical, and documentary approach based on a review of specialized literature and doctrine on hybrid threats, cognitive warfare, National Security, and strategy. The analysis confirms that contemporary transformations in conflict do not alter its political nature, but rather the instruments used to influence the will, legitimacy, and capacity of States to act. In the Peruvian case, the convergence of social unrest, illicit economies, disinformation, narrative manipulation, impacts on strategic infrastructure and corridors, and institutional weaknesses creates a scenario of high strategic vulnerability for National Security. As its main contribution, the study proposes an analytical framework that integrates political, social, economic, territorial, informational, and cognitive variables to support the interpretation of contemporary conflict scenarios from a systemic perspective. The study concludes that strengthening strategic anticipation, intelligence, interinstitutional interoperability, the protection of infrastructure and essential functions, as well as cognitive resilience, is fundamental to increasing the State's adaptive capacity in hybrid scenarios and preserving democratic governance.

Published

2026-08-31 — Updated on 2026-08-31

Versions